Last week this blog fortuitously was delayed a few hours. As a result of that delay, we were able to report on South Carolina governor Mark Sanford’s “excellent adventure” to Argentina, and all that this entailed (if you’ll pardon the pun).
The point of the article was that those conservative evangelistic folks who like to try to convince the rest of us that they have a lock on morality should keep their holier-than-thou ruminations to themselves. Sanford, and folks like him such as Sarah Palin, are members of that group. So when they get caught not practicing what they preach to the rest of us, the press jumps all over it.
Other well-known celebrities who have suffered similar weaknesses under similar circumstances of preaching to others include 1980′s TV evangelists Jim Bakker and Jummy Swaggert, among others. You can read the sordid details about them HERE. And, of course, among the most famous of cheaters is ex-president Bill Clinton, although Clinton hardly qualifies as a holier-than-thou preacher.
Of course, there are probably hundreds of millions of folks on earth (if not billions) who have engaged in behaviors that their spouses would probably would not approve of. It is, whether we wish to acknowledge it or not, a pretty prevalent characteristic of the human experience. As civilized people, we try to contain such behaviors in the interest of fairness to our families. But as imperfect beings, people sometimes fail to achieve desired goals, despite the best efforts.
Welcome to the human race, where certain folks have been fighting against reality since people started to get organized.
Many residents of South Carolina consider themselves conservative christian voters. With that in mind, consider that the GOP has been calling for Mark Sanford’s resignation with mounting urgency and insistence. They’re not insisting that Sanford resign because he left his state leaderless for almost a week, since the Lt. Governor did not know where Sanford was and there had been no transition of power to the Lt. governor. At least if that was the reason for the demand for resignation, it could be understandable, if a little excessive.
Nope. The reason for the demand that Sanford resign that is coming from the GOP has EVERYTHING to do with politics. Sanford only has a year and a half left in his term and cannot run for rel-election due to South Carolina term limit law. The GOP wants to demonstrate their commitment to family values and religious righteousness, particularly in the bible belt. Sanford is a GOP target of opportunity, as it were, that allows the party demonstrate to its extremely conservative base that it still cares about them. That’s nice, although it does nothing to fix the real damage done by the Bush administration to the GOP image. It also doesn’t do a thing to address the reality of the GOP’s misguided effort to restore credibility to the GOP.
Although the GOP has always been the first and the loudest to demand resignations over questions of marital indiscretions, particularly in Bill Clinton’s case, the reality is that many, many GOP’s have gotten caught falling off the “morality” wagon in recent years. And whatever indiscretions are committed by a politician, the place they must be addressed is with his or her spouse. When Bill “did” Monica, it was an issue that Hillary Clinton, first and foremost, had to deal with. She did so in her own way, and in private.
And except for the efforts demanded by the failed GOP impeachment proceedings, Bill Clinton left office with an approval rating around 60%. Compare that with the approval rating George W. Bush left with, around 28%. Since we have never heard of W cheating on Laura, that should tell the GOP something. That something is that the American people largely don’t care about a politician’s private life if that politician is doing the job he or she was elected to do. In other word, most thinking people really don’t care about a politician’s private life. They only care about their own.
That’s truly as it should be. Although some ultra-extreme GOPers (but certainly not all) believe that an elected official should be passing and/or signing religious laws, most of us believe that the elected official should be judged on on-the-job performance and accomplishments, and not legal off-the-job behaviors.
We, the PEOPLE finds it both curious and amusing that this liberal blog is defending a conservative republican politician. But then, we also question Ann Coulter’s ultra-extreme right wing credentials. After all, until a year ago she was engaged to a liberal lawyer from New York City, and she loves the “Grateful Dead”. But then, the GOP’s credibility just isn’t what it used to be.
So if defending a conservative republican governor is the right thing to do. it will be done. After all, someone has to do the right thing!
The issue is hypocrisy. He was perfectly willing to call for Clinton’s impeachment saying “If you undermine trust in the system you undermine everything”. He opposed gay marriage saying it threatened traditional marriage.
Its about deceit. He lied to his wife and he lied to the lieutenant Governor telling them he was going hiking and even going so far as to pack hiking gear to throw them off the track. This is the guy that lied when he told Sean Hannity that Obama had forced him to take stimulus money when in fact it was the South Carolina state legislature that overruled his petty attempt to enhance his career on the backs of the poor by rejecting the funds.
Its about misuse of state money. Yesterday he said he would release documents proving he had not used state funds to finance his trip. Today he changed his mind.. Perhaps, Rush Limbaugh, who has already blamed Obama for this affair, may now tell us how a good roll in the hay is not really a waste of taxpayer funds.
The GOP is a party full of moralizing, pontificating , hypocrites and Stanford is one of the gang along with Gingrich, Limbaugh, Palin and others too numerous to name.
He is a very visible symbol of Republican hypocrisy. And for that visibility and not for the actual deeds themselves, the GOP will force him out.
Hey, vet, did you forget what you fought for??? Adultery is a SIN!!! In fact, there should be a constitutional amendment forcing all adulterers to resign from public office. What kind of message are we sending our young people if we condone of this kind of reprehensible behavior?
All I can say is that this country is going to hell real quick since Obama to office. Next someone will want to allow nudity in public!!!
Howie said:
“The point of the article was that those conservative evangelistic folks who like to try to convince the rest of us that they have a lock on morality should keep their holier-than-thou ruminations to themselves.”
So, the point is that anyone can express their opinions except “those conservative evangelistic folks”.
Sorry, Howie. I’m not buying it.
Dale, you still didn’t get the point.
EVERYONE has a right to express their opinions. HOWEVER, if you want to maintain credibility, you probably don’t want to keep saying things that contradict your behaviors.
In other words, the “Do as I Say, Not as I Do” process doesn’t work for very long. If you’re concerned about whether or not people will take you seriously, you have the consider whether or not your actions match your words.
With that in mind, “conservative evangelical folks” REALLY stand out like a sore thumb when they get caught doing stuff that contradicts their expressed opinions.
And besides, those “conservative evangelical folks” expressing their opinions is one thing, and I will defend their right to do so; taking ACTIONS to IMPOSE their opinions on others is something else altogether. And that’s what they do…which makes them hypocrites if they don’t live up to their “opinions”.
Hope this clears it up.
Howie